![]() 05/06/2016 at 14:09 • Filed to: vote | ![]() | ![]() |
But you have to vote so everyone else knows:
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
![]() 05/06/2016 at 14:15 |
|
Make Oppo Automotive Again 2016
![]() 05/06/2016 at 14:16 |
|
Do we want everyone else to know?
![]() 05/06/2016 at 14:16 |
|
I feel like this is how elections are rigged. Except this is more important.
![]() 05/06/2016 at 14:16 |
|
We ban as necessary
![]() 05/06/2016 at 14:24 |
|
It’s only rigged if it’s not for a good cause
![]() 05/06/2016 at 14:25 |
|
Alright what’s our write in vote, I wanna make sure we all use the same one so the vote isn’t split.
EDIT: Nevermind @Oppositelock1
![]() 05/06/2016 at 14:29 |
|
@Ballaban, obviously.
![]() 05/06/2016 at 14:30 |
|
Who?
![]() 05/06/2016 at 14:36 |
|
I honestly hope Saabkyle wins.
![]() 05/16/2016 at 12:33 |
|
Hola. Ike from Untitled Car Show told me I should talk to you about Oppo authorship. Is this the appropriate way to do it? Should I be listening to a man who drinks whiskey, tequila and vodka in the same glass?
![]() 05/16/2016 at 23:33 |
|
Oppo was never purely Automotive
![]() 05/16/2016 at 23:44 |
|
We just gotta maintain the right stoichiometric weird-to-automotive ratio.
![]() 05/17/2016 at 00:07 |
|
I’m the major contributor to that. Everyone else is purely useless in that regard, so it’s OK to try!
![]() 05/17/2016 at 11:16 |
|
Is your conscious as clear as your coat?
![]() 05/17/2016 at 12:57 |
|
Nearly. Except for that one thing that one time.